Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Microtheme Revisions

Original:
    In the past few years of my education, I have been taught to write using the five- paragraph essay technique. My high school teachers have drilled this method into my brain making sure I had all the components of the five-paragraph essay. During my first week in college, I walked into my introduction to writing class to find out the five-paragraph essay isn’t the only way to write. Is there a reason why students are being taught a broader method of writing from the very beginning?
    Teaching students the five-paragraph method may be detrimental and hold students back from their writing capability. Using rhetorical knowledge requires that one must stretch and reach for different points of view. Why then is the five-paragraph technique the only way that our high school teachers have taught us? Is it because there are so many other important to high school teachers don’t know that this is a concern and think that by mastering the five-paragraph essay we will be able to write better because of out background knowledge. Also, teachers have been using the five-paragraph method for years and maybe they don’t realize the five-paragraph essay does not exclusively define writing. The traditional method might be falling away.
    By looking into this dilemma high school students’ knowledge might be increased and perhaps allow college freshman to have an easier transition from high school to college.

Revision:
    I hate the five-paragraph essay writing style. It takes all the thinking out of actually writing an essay. High school teachers have drilled this method into students’ brains year after year. My first college writing class was a complete shock. Why is this the only way that students are taught in high schools?
    One reason why the five-paragraph essay writing style is most commonly used in high schools could be that it is easiest for teacher. Since students have grown up learning it they figure one more year won’t hurt anything. Another reason might be that students have gotten so used to writing this way that changing it would be too difficult on both the student and teacher. Students have used this method for enough years that it has just become natural. They can complete it without thinking. Students may also just be lazy. They don’t want to use rhetorical knowledge to find different points of view.
   
If we could begin to take a step back and look at the way that high school students are taught to write, we might be able to think what we can do to improve the high school to college transition. We might be able to think about a way to teach students a broader range of writing styles so that they can begin to think about what they are writing.

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Fake News

Throughout the past year or so there has been an overload of news stories, both truth and fiction, but how can you tell what is what? A lot of this is because of the current state of the country and its politics. One side trying to prove that the other is morally or economically wrong. I think it is incredibly important to educate people about the way they receive news. The best way to do that though is a whole different story. I think the game show idea would work pretty well, but I could also see it being something that students decide not to participate in.

One option would be to simply talk to students about how to spot a fake news story, or that social media is not always the most reliable source of information. I think if you are to go with the game show idea, building up to more controversial topics is a good idea. Also, maybe starting out with a game where students guess whether or not a tweet or article title is true of false. That would be a good way to break the ice so to speak. Overall, I think that it is a fairly good idea, but you should be careful to avoid making people feel uncomfortable. If you focus on more than just the presidents very dumb tweets I think the event will go smoothly.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-russia-leaks-fake-news-claims-quote-a7584516.html

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Film Review

Overall, the published review of "After Innocence" and my refection of the film were fairly similar. Although there were also some differences. The published review went more into detail about each of the seven men that were convicted. It does a good job of summarizing the film and the main messages that the film tries to portray. Although there was a point in the film that it turns from a documentary of these men's lives to an almost ad for the Innocence Project. I never really thought about the film that when I was watching it, however after reading that in the review I couldn’t agree more. The published review that I read was very similar to the way I felt about the film. I enjoyed the film and the review seemed to have basically the same vibe, just more sarcastic than my review.